netdev - Re: [PATCH 05/39] wimax: debug macros and debug settings for the WiMAX stack

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 2 Dec 2008 18:07:44 -0800
From:	Inaky Perez-Gonzalez <inaky@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc:	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/39] wimax: debug macros and debug settings for the WiMAX stack

On Thursday 27 November 2008, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-11-26 at 15:07 -0800, Inaky Perez-Gonzalez wrote:
> > This file contains a simple debug framework that is used in the stack;
>
>                        ^^^^^ ??
>
> > it allows the debug level to be controlled at compile-time (so the
> > debug code is optimized out) and at run-time (for what wasn't compiled
> > out).
>
> Recently we got new stuff for dynamic printk
> (include/linux/dynamic_printk.h) and pr_debug with a start format
> (include/linux/kernel.h, pr_fmt); can you use any of that to make this
> smaller? If not, I think you ought to argue why not, and possibly
> improve the generic facility.

Yep, it was just too recent. I hadn't noticed it and I was told about
it a week ago. I just need to map it. It's on my plan to change it,
but I don't know if I'll have to do it for the push.

> Personally, I'm tired of seeing every Intel driver come with a new huge
> set of debugging macros that are barely understandable.

me too -- I am glad there is finally a common facility in the kernel
for it. 

> > +#define _d_printf(l, tag, dev, f, a...)					\
> > +do {									\
> > +	char head[64];							\
> > +	if (!d_test(l))							\
> > +		break;							\
> > +	__d_head(head, sizeof(head), dev);				\
> > +	printk(KERN_ERR "%s%s%s: " f, head, __func__, tag, ##a);	\
> > +} while (0 && dev)
>
> That && dev is wrong.

Another remnant from a previous implementation -- killed, thanks

-- 
Inaky

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html