[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20081203.212542.139360072.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2008 21:25:42 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi
Cc: ptesarik@...e.cz, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp: make urg+gso work for real this time
From: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 20:31:09 +0200 (EET)
> On Wed, 3 Dec 2008, Petr Tesarik wrote:
>
> > Ilpo Järvinen píse v St 03. 12. 2008 v 13:22 +0200:
> > Yes, re-fragmenting the packet here is probably the best way to go. But
> > repeating the same condition on multiple places is not so nice. What
> > about this little improvement?
>
> Yeah, this too will work... Though not of too much significance since
> I've already most of unification of those two functions in a local
> queue awaiting testing, polish up and submit to net-next.
>
> When sending an updated version davem prefers to have full changelog in it
> btw, it saves some work for him.
>
> > (I didn't roll the revert of 33cf71cee1 into it, as it makes the actual
> > change less obvious. I think there are better ways of doing a revert in
> > git.)
>
> Whatever, I've no strong opinion either way though it's just broken with
> and without the revert anyway, the full thing is needed to actually fix
> it.
I've applied Ilpo's version of the fix patch, thanks everyone.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists