[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m1k5afqcxx.fsf@frodo.ebiederm.org>
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2008 23:49:14 -0800
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
Cc: Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, adobriyan@...il.com,
auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
eparis@...isplace.org
Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] networking probs in next-20081203
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org> writes:
> On Thu, 4 Dec 2008, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
>> Which piece of selinux magic did I miss?
>
> The problem is that SELinux doesn't know anything about the new filesystem
> type, and specifically, to treat it like procfs. There are a couple
> workarounds we can try to prevent this specific problem from cropping up
> again.
The thing is I believe I changed the internal filesystem test to
strncmp(fstype, "proc", 4);
Which should match both proc and proc/net
And likewise I thought I provided the same name by for the magic label
lookup by name.
>> In particular can you tell if this was a code bug or a logic bug?
>
> I wouldn't say it was a bug, more a consequence of necessarily imperfect
> encapsulation of the security code via LSM. It's just something we have to
> keep an eye out for.
Yes. Was the piece I missed in the LSM rules loaded from user space?
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists