[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20081205.183015.127189402.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 18:30:15 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: wangchen@...fujitsu.com
Cc: gregkh@...e.de, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH next] staging-p80211: Kill directly reference of c
From: Wang Chen <wangchen@...fujitsu.com>
Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2008 10:28:45 +0800
> Greg KH said the following on 2008-12-5 23:44:
> > thanks for the patch, I'll queue it up,
>
> I'm doing this "kill netdev->priv" work on Dave's net-next tree now.
> So, will it be better to let Dave apply this to his net-next instead
> you apply it?
> Just suggestion :)
Yes, I would prefer it be done this way so I can do the final
kill of the netdev->priv member without having to wait for
a dependency on the staging tree :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists