netdev - Re: sumgem problems with initializiation order at a 1000SX SERDES card [experimental patch]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 09 Dec 2008 00:06:31 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	Hermann.Lauer@....uni-heidelberg.de
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: sumgem problems with initializiation order at a 1000SX SERDES
 card [experimental patch]

From: Hermann Lauer <Hermann.Lauer@....uni-heidelberg.de>
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 16:59:36 +0100

> On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 05:33:24PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> 
> > And this new code is just a copy of the PHY init sequence on
> > PCS, so we should split that out into a helper function instead
> > of duplicating it.
> > 
> > Any time gem_reset() is invoked, the PCS is going to need to be
> > reset like this, so let's do the advertisement reinit there.
> > 
> > Does this version of the fix work for you?
> 
> Yes, works the same. It has some delay before receiving packets works
> after an ifconfig up or a reestablishing of the link, but thats
> the same as with the experimental patch.
> Probably the link state handling has to be improved, I'm not
> shure my experimental patch was correct there.
> 
> But as the driver is working now with this patch on this hardware
> and not without - please commit.

I agree, and that's what I'll do.

Thanks for testing.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html