netdev - Re: CIFS regression in 2.6.27.8

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20081209154932.0952fbf3@dhcp-100-2-144.bos.redhat.com>
Date:	Tue, 9 Dec 2008 15:49:32 -0500
From:	Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	"Pekka Enberg" <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
	"Dennis Hardy" <dhardy@...etthis.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, layton@...hat.com,
	"Steven French" <sfrench@...ibm.com>, "Greg KH" <gregkh@...e.de>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Holger Hoffstaette <holger@...ards.de>,
	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
Subject: Re: CIFS regression in 2.6.27.8

On Mon, 8 Dec 2008 21:12:48 +0100
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:

> On Monday, 8 of December 2008, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > Hi Dennis,
> > 
> > On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 8:18 PM, Dennis Hardy <dhardy@...etthis.com> wrote:
> > > I just mounted a network drive (Windows Server) via CIFS under 2.6.27.8, and
> > > the sizes reported by "df" are completely incorrect:
> > >
> > >  root@...dus:~# df -h /mnt/fsv1
> > >  Filesystem            Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> > >  //fsv1/Users          446G -222G  667G   -  /mnt/fsv1
> > >  root@...dus:~# df /mnt/fsv1
> > >  Filesystem           1K-blocks      Used Available Use% Mounted on
> > >  //fsv1/Users         467403140 -231816588 699219728   -  /mnt/fsv1
> > >  root@...dus:~# mount | grep fsv1
> > >  //fsv1/Users on /mnt/fsv1 type cifs (rw,mand)
> > >  root@...dus:~#
> > >
> > > Does anyone else see this sort of behavior with 2.6.27.8?  This worked fine
> > > in 2.6.27.6 (we skipped 2.6.27.7)...
> > >

I tried it on both i386 and x86_64 and had no problems. Is this client
non-x86 by any chance?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html