netdev - Re: qmgr for ixp4xx

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b0438a630812100832l417f4df6lbbf5263e338baff2@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 10 Dec 2008 17:32:55 +0100
From:	"Miguel Ángel Álvarez" <gotzoncabanes@...il.com>
To:	"Krzysztof Halasa" <khc@...waw.pl>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: qmgr for ixp4xx

Hi.

Complementing the previous mail.

I have implemented 64 queues for ixp4xx (following Karl's patch).

My idea was to use queues 32-39 for my eight txreadyq.

As rxq and txreadyq from ethernet in NPEB and NPEC conflict with the
queues in the ixp4xx_hss driver, I have decided to use queues 40-43
for them. Solving a problem with qmgr_stat_overflow, I have been able
to configure the interface (ethernet in NPEB). However not even a ping
can be sent.

Thinking that the problem was using >= 32 queues, I decided to use
queues 23-26... With the same result. So queues 3, 4, 20 and 21 seem
to be fixed for ethernet. But they are also used for HSS!!!

Any ideas?

Miguel Ángel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html