[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0812101359030.11805@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 14:00:44 -0500 (EST)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] replace deprecated RW_LOCK_UNLOCKED in
net/dccp/proto.c
On Wed, 10 Dec 2008, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> cced netdev
Thanks,
>
> Steven Rostedt a ?crit :
> >
> > struct inet_hashinfo __cacheline_aligned dccp_hashinfo = {
> > - .lhash_lock = RW_LOCK_UNLOCKED,
> > + .lhash_lock = __RW_LOCK_UNLOCKED(dccp_hashinfo.lhash_lock),
> > .lhash_users = ATOMIC_INIT(0),
> > .lhash_wait = __WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD_INITIALIZER(dccp_hashinfo.lhash_wait),
> > };
> > --
>
> Hum... this rwlock doesnt exist anymore on net-next-2.6, all this stuff
> was converted to RCU for upcoming 2.6.29
>
> struct inet_hashinfo dccp_hashinfo;
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dccp_hashinfo);
>
> I guess such a patch wont ease David job when 2.6.29 merge window opens
One of the requirements in the new rt git tree is that all rwlocks must
use the __RW_LOCK_UNLOCK(lock) macro. I had to fix it in our tree, but
whenever I do a clean up patch, I like to share it ;-)
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists