[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081213140154.GK10372@solarflare.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 14:01:56 +0000
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 25/33] sfc: Generate unique names for per-NIC workqueues
David Miller wrote:
> From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
> Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 06:23:03 +0000
>
> > David Miller wrote:
> > > create_singlethread_workqueue() is going to reference this
> > > name buffer on the stack for the life of the workqueue, but
> > > once this function returns that reference will no longer
> > > be valid.
> >
> > No, it's copied into the "comm" field of task_struct.
>
> Hmmm...
>
> create_singlethread_workqueue(name...
> --> __create_workqueue(name...
> --> __create_workqueue_key(name...
>
> which goes:
> wq->cpu_wq = alloc_percpu(struct cpu_workqueue_struct);
> ...
> wq->name = name;
>
> Which looks like a dynamic memory assumption to me.
If you look carefully you'll see that wq->name is never used after
initialisation of single-threaded workqueues. But I'd agree it's not
nice to have that dangling pointer around, so I'll respin this.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists