[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.WNT.4.64.0812141124040.13556@ppwaskie-MOBL2.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 11:36:14 -0800 (Pacific Standard Time)
From: "Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P" <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
cc: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] ethtool: Add GGRO and SGRO ops
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 10:35:27PM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> >
> > If I'm not mistaken, the whole point of set_flags() is to end the
> > continued expansion of struct ethtool_ops by another 2 functions for
> > every new offload feature. The comments make it fairly clear that Jeff
> > anticipated that it might be necessary to include such checks for some
> > flags.
>
> GRO is purely a stack feature so it doesn't need anything in
> ethtool_ops at all.
I'm confused then. You're adding two ethtool entry points with
ETHTOOL_GGRO and ETHTOOL_SGRO, adding the callpoints in dev_ethtool with
set_gro and get_gro, but how do you manipulate this without adding to the
userspace application? Adding this functionality to the set/get_flags
will keep the userspace app from needing a patch to support the new
callbacks.
Cheers,
-PJ Waskiewicz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists