netdev - Re: bnx2x machine check in bnx2x_ack

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1229369794.26330.2.camel@lb-tlvb-eliezer>
Date:	Mon, 15 Dec 2008 21:36:34 +0200
From:	"Eilon Greenstein" <eilong@...adcom.com>
To:	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bjorn.helgaas@...com>
cc:	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: bnx2x machine check in bnx2x_ack_int()

On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 10:04 -0800, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> Yep, it's definitely possible that this is HW related.  The proto
> has 57710, but the product will ultimately use the 57711, so I don't
> really even care about testing the 57710.
> 
> After upgrading some pieces on my boards, I can't reproduce the
> MCA either.  So I guess we can just write it off for now.  The only
> reason I pointed out the issue at all is because it really hampered
> testing of standard distro bits on the rest of the box.

Please let me know if you see this issue again - we can try to
root-cause it. And again, sorry for the late initial response.

Eilon


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html