netdev - Re: [PATCH][RFC 23/23]: Support for zero-copy TCP transmit of user space data

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e2e108260812160800h66e525f2p8c6c78b1b73630d1@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 16 Dec 2008 17:00:07 +0100
From:	"Bart Van Assche" <bart.vanassche@...il.com>
To:	"Evgeniy Polyakov" <zbr@...emap.net>
Cc:	"Vladislav Bolkhovitin" <vst@...b.net>, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
	"James Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, scst-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC 23/23]: Support for zero-copy TCP transmit of user space data

On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 10:45 PM, Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net> wrote:
> Another approach is to increase skb's shared data (at the end of the
> skb->data), and this approach was not frowned upon too much either, but
> it requires to mess with skb->destructor, which may not be appropriate
> in some cases. If iscsi does not use sockets (it does iirc), things are
> much simpler.

Hello Evgeniy,

Any idea whether it would be acceptable to extend "struct sock" with
one or two pointers to callback functions ? These callback functions
could be called from skb_release_data() etc. through the "struct sock*
sk" member of "struct sk_buff".

Bart.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html