[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081216020432.GA6454@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 13:04:32 +1100
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
johnpol@....mipt.ru, bhutchings@...arflare.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] net: Add Generic Receive Offload infrastructure
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 03:39:20PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> > Presumably ptype_base[] is a static array rather than a dynamically
> > allocated array that is resized under RCU protection, right? Otherwise,
> > you could get in trouble if the above raced with the resize operation due
> > to the fact that you are outside of the RCU read-side critical section.
>
> Yes, and we've been using RCU this way for this table for quite
> some time. From net/core/dev.c:
>
> #define PTYPE_HASH_SIZE (16)
> #define PTYPE_HASH_MASK (PTYPE_HASH_SIZE - 1)
>
> static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(ptype_lock);
> static struct list_head ptype_base[PTYPE_HASH_SIZE] __read_mostly;
> static struct list_head ptype_all __read_mostly; /* Taps */
Thanks for confirming. Yes unless there is a sudden surge of
new Ethernet protocols we shouldn't need to resize this ever :)
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists