netdev - Re: Bonding gigabit and fast?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200812170737.12575.tvrtko@ursulin.net>
Date:	Wed, 17 Dec 2008 07:37:12 +0000
From:	"Tvrtko A. Ursulin" <tvrtko@...ulin.net>
To:	Chris Snook <csnook@...hat.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Bonding gigabit and fast?

On Tuesday 16 December 2008 22:55:47 Tvrtko A. Ursulin wrote:
> So this points to Samba/scheduler/CIFS client regression I think. I'll try
> to do more testing in the following days. All this assuming that ~22Mb/s is
> the best this machine can do and only hunting for slow and unstable speed
> over Samba.

In the morning I am not so sure about this any more. Problem is there is no 
regression with fast ethernet and it being faster than gigabit it moves the 
blame back to networking/skge.

Do you any ideas for further tests which could clarify this?

Thanks,

Tvrtko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html