[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49495689.9090205@hp.com>
Date:	Wed, 17 Dec 2008 11:44:09 -0800
From:	Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>
To:	Divy Le Ray <divy@...lsio.com>
CC:	Linux Network Development list <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Soft Lockups on 2.6.28-rc8 under netperf bulk receive workload
Divy Le Ray wrote:
> Can you please reconfigure your kernel with the following kernel hacking
> options enabled, and run your tests again?
> 
> Kernel hacking
> 	Kernel debugging
> 		Detect soft lockups
> 	RT mutex debugging
> 	Spinlock and rw-lock debugging: basic checks
> 	Mutex debugging: basic checks
Got the above
> 	Lock debugging: detect incorrect freeing of live locks
> 	Lock debugging: prove locking correctness
I don't see those two above in a make menuconfig
> 	Spinlock debugging: sleep-inside-spinlock checking
> 	Compile the kernel with debug info
Got those above.
> 	Compile the kernel with frame pointers
That doesn't appear in make menuconfig in kernel hacking either.
I built a kernel with those I could find enabled, and I think it invoked 
the spirit of Heisenberg - no more soft lockups appearing on the 
console.  I think it has also _significantly_ dropped the throughput.
I've since learned how to tell caliper one doesn't care about the 
per-process stuff and just lump it all together.  The cycles and cgprof 
profiles for the debug run can be found under the same URL as before:
ftp://ftp.netperf.org/lockup
with what I hope are obvious names.
rick jones
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
