[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49495689.9090205@hp.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 11:44:09 -0800
From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>
To: Divy Le Ray <divy@...lsio.com>
CC: Linux Network Development list <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Soft Lockups on 2.6.28-rc8 under netperf bulk receive workload
Divy Le Ray wrote:
> Can you please reconfigure your kernel with the following kernel hacking
> options enabled, and run your tests again?
>
> Kernel hacking
> Kernel debugging
> Detect soft lockups
> RT mutex debugging
> Spinlock and rw-lock debugging: basic checks
> Mutex debugging: basic checks
Got the above
> Lock debugging: detect incorrect freeing of live locks
> Lock debugging: prove locking correctness
I don't see those two above in a make menuconfig
> Spinlock debugging: sleep-inside-spinlock checking
> Compile the kernel with debug info
Got those above.
> Compile the kernel with frame pointers
That doesn't appear in make menuconfig in kernel hacking either.
I built a kernel with those I could find enabled, and I think it invoked
the spirit of Heisenberg - no more soft lockups appearing on the
console. I think it has also _significantly_ dropped the throughput.
I've since learned how to tell caliper one doesn't care about the
per-process stuff and just lump it all together. The cycles and cgprof
profiles for the debug run can be found under the same URL as before:
ftp://ftp.netperf.org/lockup
with what I hope are obvious names.
rick jones
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists