lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081218223851.GA1637@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date:	Fri, 19 Dec 2008 09:38:51 +1100
From:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To:	Martin Willi <martin@...ongswan.org>
Cc:	davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfrm: Accept ESP packets regardless of UDP
	encapsulation mode

On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 10:04:53PM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
>
> > [1]https://lists.strongswan.org/pipermail/users/2008-December/002936.html
> 
> Right that's what led to this patch.
> 
> Reading this it seems that there is either a bug in strongswan or
> in its peer.  IKE or IKEv2 is supposed to negotiate UDP encapsulation
> explicitly.  So either we did negotiate to use UDP encapsulation,
> and Strongswan ignored it (it's buggy), or we didn't and the peer
> still chose to use it (the peer is buggy).

You didn't address this part.

What KM/OS was the peer running? How was it configured?

Cheers,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ