[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3034A747-1AD3-43FA-8939-67D654E3078A@freescale.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 20:40:20 -0600
From: "Fleming Andy-AFLEMING" <afleming@...escale.com>
To: "David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: "Jeff Garzik" <jeff@...zik.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2.6.29 v3 5/5] gianfar: Continue polling until both tx and rx are empty
On Dec 17, 2008, at 18:55, "David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: Andy Fleming <afleming@...escale.com>
> Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 15:42:55 -0600
>
>> gfar_poll would declare polling done once the rx queue was empty,
>> but the tx queue could still have packets left.
>>
>> Stolen mostly from the e1000 driver.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andy Fleming <afleming@...escale.com>
>
> Applied.
>
> But I absolutely do not recommend this polling technique at all.
>
> The best scheme is to first purge your TX ring completely, and do not
> apply any quota to this work. It's relatively cheap and batches well.
>
> Then, you process the RX ring and apply the quota only to the RX ring
> work.
>
> This is what every NAPI driver I've written does and it gives the best
> results.
I agree it seems a bit screwy, but I got a 4-5% performance increase.
It may just require better tuning of my tx coalescing parameters-I was
getting 7x the number of tx irqs as rx.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists