[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1LD9rC-0007y7-KY@gondolin.me.apana.org.au>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:47:26 +1100
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: martin@...ongswan.org (Martin Willi)
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfrm: Accept ESP packets regardless of UDP encapsulation mode
Martin Willi <martin@...ongswan.org> wrote:
> An IPsec node speaking IKEv2 MUST accept incoming UDP encapsulated
> ESP packets, even if no NAT situation is detected. This is important
> if MOBIKE is in use. Some implementation keep the encapsulation
> mode if they move out of a NAT situation.
>
> diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c
> index b4a1317..65bcf09 100644
> --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c
> +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c
> @@ -167,11 +167,6 @@ int xfrm_input(struct sk_buff *skb, int nexthdr, __be32 spi, int encap_type)
> goto drop_unlock;
> }
>
> - if ((x->encap ? x->encap->encap_type : 0) != encap_type) {
> - XFRM_INC_STATS(net, LINUX_MIB_XFRMINSTATEMISMATCH);
> - goto drop_unlock;
> - }
This can't work as ESP relies on this check. Now that it's gone
ESP may touch a UDP header which doesn't exist.
What exactly are you trying to achieve?
Thanks,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists