lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 18 Dec 2008 15:21:42 +1100
From:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	martin@...ongswan.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfrm: Accept ESP packets regardless of UDP
	encapsulation mode

On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 08:17:55PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
>
> My interpretation of the situation is that when you change (address or
> NAT-T) you still have to perform the renegotiation over the old SA.
> 
> Or something like that.

Do you have a pointer to that?

For each connection you have a pair of SAs, they're keyed by

	(dst, spi, proto)

So if one party's address changes then you immediately lose one
direction, which means the SAs are now inoperable as a bi-directional
channel.

In any case, AFAIK negotiations are conducted outside of SAs, on
port 500 or 4500, so this shouldn't matter.

Cheers,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ