[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1229680846.13159.115.camel@martin>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 11:00:45 +0100
From: Martin Willi <martin@...ongswan.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
sbergman@...hut.fi
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfrm: Accept ESP packets regardless of UDP encapsulation mode
> I'm going to revert the change from net-next-2.6 from now
Yes, I'm fine with that.
> 3) Martin can apply the change locally to do testing until we
> work this stuff out.
I'll do some testing with a modified patch that accepts encapsulated
packets on a non-encapsulating SA, but not vice-versa. This should solve
that specific issue without introducing that (and hopefully no other)
regression.
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c
index 7527940..ffc32f5 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c
@@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ int xfrm_input(struct sk_buff *skb, int nexthdr, __be32 spi, int encap_type)
goto drop_unlock;
}
- if ((x->encap ? x->encap->encap_type : 0) != encap_type) {
+ if (x->encap && x->encap->encap_type != encap_type) {
XFRM_INC_STATS(LINUX_MIB_XFRMINSTATEMISMATCH);
goto drop_unlock;
}
--
1.5.6.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists