[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m3hc4voo2a.fsf@maximus.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 23:14:05 +0100
From: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>
To: Hannes Eder <hannes@...neseder.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/27] drivers/net: fix sparse warnings: make do-while a compound statement
Hannes Eder <hannes@...neseder.net> writes:
> Fix this sparse warnings:
Or: break the formating to silence sparse.
> drivers/net/atp.c:811:8: warning: do-while statement is not a compound statement
> drivers/net/atp.c:813:8: warning: do-while statement is not a compound statement
> drivers/net/atp.c:815:11: warning: do-while statement is not a compound statement
> drivers/net/atp.c:817:11: warning: do-while statement is not a compound statement
> --- a/drivers/net/starfire.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/starfire.c
> @@ -882,9 +882,9 @@ static int mdio_read(struct net_device *dev, int phy_id, int location)
> void __iomem *mdio_addr = np->base + MIICtrl + (phy_id<<7) + (location<<2);
> int result, boguscnt=1000;
> /* ??? Should we add a busy-wait here? */
> - do
> + do {
> result = readl(mdio_addr);
> - while ((result & 0xC0000000) != 0x80000000 && --boguscnt > 0);
> + } while ((result & 0xC0000000) != 0x80000000 && --boguscnt > 0);
> if (boguscnt == 0)
> return 0;
> if ((result & 0xffff) == 0xffff)
I don't know how one could think the above is an improvement.
This "do-while statement is not a compound statement" warning is
pure nonsense.
--
Krzysztof Halasa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists