netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/3] Add support for RX packet classification in a network device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <4950328F.9020409@Sun.COM>
Date:	Mon, 22 Dec 2008 16:36:31 -0800
From:	Santwona.Behera@....COM
To:	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, jeff@...zik.org,
	gkernel-commit@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	Matheos Worku <Matheos.Worku@....COM>,
	Mehdi Bonyadi <Mehdi.Bonyadi@....COM>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Add support for RX packet classification in a network
 device


>>
>> 1. I change AH_ESP_Vx_FLOW defines to AH_Vx_FLOW defines and add 2 new 
>> defines for ESP_Vx_FLOW at the end, with values 0x9 and 0xa.
> 
> If AH_ESP_Vx_FLOW has only ever been implemented as AH-only then perhaps
> this is reasonable.
> 
>> 2. I keep the AH_ESP_Vx_FLOW defines as is (but this will be dead code 
>> as it will not be used) and add 2 new AH_Vx_FLOW defines and 2 new 
>> ESP_Vx_FLOW defines at the end with values 0x9, 0xa, 0xb, 0xc.
> 
> This is safest.

OK, I will re-implement it this way then.

> 
> Also you are probably right to remove RXH_DEV_PORT as that appears to be
> an niu quirk that shouldn't be exposed.

That was the reasoning behind removing RXH_DEV_PORT.

rgds,
--santwona
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html