netdev - Re: splice from half-closed socket returning -EAGAIN

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 5 Jan 2009 08:11:37 +0000
From:	Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	buytenh@...tstofly.org, jens.axboe@...cle.com, ben@...s.com,
	opurdila@...acom.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: splice from half-closed socket returning -EAGAIN

On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 11:59:46PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@...tstofly.org>
> Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 07:47:29 +0100
> 
> > tcp: don't mask EOF and socket errors on nonblocking splice receive
> > 
> > Currently, setting SPLICE_F_NONBLOCK on splice from a TCP socket
> > results in masking of EOF (RDHUP) and error conditions on the socket
> > by an -EAGAIN return.  Move the NONBLOCK check in tcp_splice_read()
> > to be after the EOF and error checks to fix this.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@...vell.com>
> 
> This change looks like the perfect fix for this problem.
> 

Actually, I wonder why this "if (flags & SPLICE_F_NONBLOCK)" can't
be skipped at all. Isn't "if (!timeo)" enough now?

Jarek P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html