netdev - Re: [GIT]: Networking

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7v7i58or4q.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
Date:	Mon, 05 Jan 2009 23:00:53 -0800
From:	Junio C Hamano <gitster@...ox.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT]: Networking

David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> writes:

> That wouldn't have helped me in this case at all.
>
> I had 4 firmware patches to apply, each one had to add entries
> to the same file.
>
> The first patch had to be skipped.
>
> So the second one, which is the first one I added (which is the acenic
> bogon with the missed delete), is the one GIT wouldn't take but patch
> would.

What I typically do when I see myself in such a situation is to apply all
of four patches to a throw-away branch once, and then discard that branch
right away.  Then I can apply only the good three patches, skipping the
first one, and "am -3" would still apply.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html