[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <874p0cvnae.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk>
Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2009 09:42:01 +0100
From: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@...site.dk>
To: Wu Fengguang <wfg@...ux.intel.com>, dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dm9601: handle corrupt mac address
>>>>> "Wu" == Wu Fengguang <wfg@...ux.intel.com> writes:
Hi,
>> Do we automatically get a random address in netdev nowadays without
>> calling random_ether_addr? I didn't know that.
Wu> I confirmed based on both code review and tests.
Wu> The logic goes like this in usbnet.c:
Wu> 80 // randomly generated ethernet address
Wu> 81 static u8 node_id [ETH_ALEN];
Wu> ...
Wu> 1118 int
Wu> 1119 usbnet_probe (struct usb_interface *udev, const struct usb_device_id *prod)
Wu> 1120 {
Wu> ...
Wu> 1168 dev->net = net;
Wu> 1169 strcpy (net->name, "usb%d");
Wu> 1170 memcpy (net->dev_addr, node_id, sizeof node_id);
Wu> ...
So what happens if you plug in 2 devices without an EEPROM? Do they
get the same MAC address? That seems broken.
>> Anyway, I would prefer to add a dev_warn mentioning the fact that
>> we're using a random address (and which one).
Wu> I'll do that in another patch. Since I'd like to add one more similar
Wu> warning to dm9601_set_mac_address(). That warning helped me identify
Wu> this bug.
Ok.
--
Bye, Peter Korsgaard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists