[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090107125535.GC6307@1wt.eu>
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 13:55:35 +0100
From: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Data corruption issue with splice() on 2.6.27.10
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 03:46:29PM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 11:42:46PM +1100, Herbert Xu (herbert@...dor.apana.org.au) wrote:
> > > Doesn't your tcp fallbacks to kernel_sendmsg() without sg in
> > > tcp_sendpage()? And then just feeds data into the stack the same way it
> > > happens with send() i.e. by copying it.
> >
> > Good point. Did he check GSO though? GSO will always enable SG
> > on the socket regardless of the netdev's setting. And if the device
> > started out with SG enabled then recent kernels will enable GSO
> > by default.
>
> Willy, what was the kernel you are tested no-accel behaviour and what
> were the gso settings?
kernel is 2.6.27.10 + a few patches (squashfs, etc..., nothing related to
this area). My ethtool is a bit old and does not report GSO. I'll download
and rebuild a more recent one and retest.
> Can you add a simple single print into tcp_sendpage() to determine if
> content was copied or fed into do_tcp_sendpages() otherwise?
Yes, will do that too.
Willy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists