netdev - Re: [BUG #12364] Re: HTB - very bad precision? HFSC works fine! 2.6.28

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200901091232.09923.denys@visp.net.lb>
Date:	Fri, 9 Jan 2009 12:32:09 +0200
From:	Denys Fedoryschenko <denys@...p.net.lb>
To:	Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
Cc:	Jorge Bastos <mysql.jorge@...imal.pt>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	bugme-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG #12364] Re: HTB - very bad precision? HFSC works fine! 2.6.28

HZ still matter? With tickless kernel and hrtimers?

On Friday 09 January 2009 12:30:30 Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 11:57:13PM +0200, Denys Fedoryschenko wrote:
> > Can 100HZ be issue?
>
> Generally, if you need precise scheduling HZ=1000 should be used if
> higher cpu usage isn't a problem.
>
> Jarek P.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html