netdev - Re: Allowing more than 64k connections and heavily optimize bind(0) time.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200901111503.10736.denys@visp.net.lb>
Date:	Sun, 11 Jan 2009 15:03:10 +0200
From:	Denys Fedoryschenko <denys@...p.net.lb>
To:	Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Allowing more than 64k connections and heavily optimize bind(0) time.

I did test on loaded squid.

49878 connections established ,1421/sec
It is not peak time yet, passed 24 hours testing.

I can't compare load, because it is real life load and always vary, but thing 
i can say, it doesn't crash :-)

On Sunday 11 January 2009 14:52:06 Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 11:20:19PM -0800, David Miller (davem@...emloft.net) 
wrote:
> > > I'm getting out from the vacations tomorrow and will try to more
> > > extensively test the patch (QA group found a bug in ipv6 side, but that
> > > was with the .24 backported patch, current one does not have that
> > > codepath iirc). But I would like to know if this worth it.
> >
> > I'll look at it at some point but it won't make this merge window,
> > sorry.
>
> Ok, please drop me a not and if things are good, merge the patch
> into the appropriate tree for the next window when time permits.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html