[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200901122230.25976.rdenis@simphalempin.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 22:30:25 +0200
From: Rémi Denis-Courmont <rdenis@...phalempin.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Michael Stone <michael@...top.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFC: Network privilege separation.
Le lundi 12 janvier 2009 22:39:31 Andi Kleen, vous avez écrit :
> > What's the point of writing a parser (that could also have bugs) when the
>
> Sorry you lost me. What do you mean with parser here?
>
> > kernel can do it?
>
> And what does it have to do with the kernel?
The parser at the other end of the pipe. The more intricate the over-the-pipe
protocol is, the more likely it is to be buggy and the security scheme to
break.
> > A normal DVD would be over 30 megabytes per seconds once decoded, just
> > for the
>
> On many modern systems 30MB/s copies is nothing ... Also in this
> case they tend to be cache hot, which makes them much cheaper.
> Yes it would be somewhat slower, but if it avoids a couple of security
> updates that would be probably worth it.
If codecs did not care about performance, they'd be written in some high-level
language that could easily be sandboxed by its own VM.
As the guy who's been dealing with VLC security issues for the past two years,
I have to say, I am in no way interested in SECCOMP as it _currently_ is.
--
Rémi Denis-Courmont
http://www.remlab.net/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists