[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <496B415D.8050401@trash.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:10:53 +0100
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, devik@....cz,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/6] Re: [PATCH 2/6] pkt_sched: sch_htb: Consider used
jiffies in htb_dequeue()
Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 11:22:47AM +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> ...
>> It doesn't bother me :) I just think its the technical better
>> and also most likely code-wise cleaner solution to this problem.
>> Cancellation wouldn't be necessary since an unnecessary
>> netif_schedule() doesn't really matter.
>
> Hmm... Do you mean during destroying... It's probably not very long,
> but deleting and creating qdiscs especially for some virtual devices
> can take longer I guess.
I was referring to your statement "but also some overhead when
cancelling this workqueue" and assumed you meant during packet
processing. In the destruction path it really doesn't matter at
all.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists