[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <496C4922.1020700@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:56:18 +0800
From: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: joe.tian.kernel@...il.com, qhfeng.kernel@...il.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NET: fix wrong English expression in comments
David Miller wrote:
> From: joe tian <joe.tian.kernel@...il.com>
> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:36:51 +0800
>
>> 2009/1/12 Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>:
>>>> @@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ struct inet_bind_bucket;
>>>> struct inet_timewait_sock {
>>>> /*
>>>> * Now struct sock also uses sock_common, so please just
>>>> - * don't add nothing before this first member (__tw_common) --acme
>>>> + * don't add anything before this first member (__tw_common) --acme
>>> They are the same meaning...
>>>
>> I don't think they are the same meaning.
>> I think "don't add anything" means "do add nothing" but not means "don't add
>> nothing"
>
> No offense to anyone, but the only people arguing for "correctness"
> seem to be non-native speakers of English. Is this correct? :-)
>
Yes, Chinese guys, to be more specific. ;)
> As Ben tries to explain, "don't add nothing" is a colloquialism of
> English that in fact can mean "do not add"
>
> It sounds amusing when read, and I'm not killing the character and
> personality of this comment just for some language lawyering.
>
> No way.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists