netdev - Re: [BUG #12364] Re: HTB - very bad precision? HFSC works fine! 2.6.28

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090113095323.GB4808@ff.dom.local>
Date:	Tue, 13 Jan 2009 09:53:23 +0000
From:	Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
To:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Cc:	Denys Fedoryschenko <denys@...p.net.lb>,
	Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...u.dk>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG #12364] Re: HTB - very bad precision? HFSC works fine!
	2.6.28

On 13-01-2009 05:33, Patrick McHardy wrote:
...
> Its odd that HZ=1000 solved the problem despite HR timers being active.
> Are you sure they're actually enabled? You should see something like
> this in the ringbuffer:

If packets are received in netif_rx_action() for ~2 jiffies why is it
odd they will be xmitted differently after changing HZ?

Jarek P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html