[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <1231808775.591.6.camel@dhollis-lnx>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:06:15 -0500
From: David Hollis <dhollis@...ehollis.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: jeff@...zik.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] asix: Add support for AX88772A devices
On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 16:18 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 00:17:04 -0800 (PST)
>
> > From: David Hollis <dhollis@...ehollis.com>
> > Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 10:44:25 -0500
> >
> > > @@ -878,20 +885,22 @@ static struct ethtool_ops ax88772_ethtoo
> > >
> > > static int ax88772_link_reset(struct usbnet *dev)
> > > {
> > > - u16 mode;
> > > - struct ethtool_cmd ecmd;
> > > + u16 mode = AX88772_MEDIUM_DEFAULT;
> > > + u16 bmcr;
> > >
> > > - mii_check_media(&dev->mii, 1, 1);
> > > - mii_ethtool_gset(&dev->mii, &ecmd);
> > > - mode = AX88772_MEDIUM_DEFAULT;
> > > + bmcr = asix_mdio_read(dev->net, dev->mii.phy_id, MII_BMCR);
> >
> > Just out of curiosity, why did you have to change this
> > function to not use the generic mii_*() routines just
> > to support this new device variant?
>
> Ping?
>
> I'm not applying this patch until you answer this question.
>
I'm currently waiting on feedback from the original contributor of the
patch. I looked through the mii_ethtool_gset function and it
effectively is performing the same task (and then some) so I can't see
any reason why the link_reset() function needs the changes. I'll submit
a new patch without those changes and will submit any changes to the
link_reset() that may happen to be required when I get a response from
the contributor.
Thanks.
> Thank you.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists