[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090114100550.GA22976@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:05:50 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Steve.Glendinning@...c.com
Cc: "Stanley.Miao" <stanley.miao@...driver.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] smsc911x: add irq_flags in smsc911x_platform_config.
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 08:54:36AM +0000, Steve.Glendinning@...c.com wrote:
> > When calling request IRQ it is desirable to allow platforms
> > to specific flags for the call to request_irq. Adding irq_flags
> > to smsc911x_platform_config allows these flags to be passed.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stanley.Miao <stanley.miao@...driver.com>
>
> Acked-by: Steve Glendinning <steve.glendinning@...c.com>
>
> Thanks Stanley.
>
> I have two more arm platform smsc911x conversion patches (realview and
> pcm037) which I'll post for review shortly. Both also depend on this
> irq_flags change, as they register their interrupts shared. David: would
> it make sense to put this driver patch into the arm tree?
Does this really make sense? Normally, the interrupt level/edge stuff is
passed through the resource structure.
I can't really comment because it seems that there's no way to work out
what patch you're acking. I can't find it in the last 6 months of email,
and there's no attributation for your quoted reply to hint at when the
original message was sent.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists