[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <OF9A85B122.E6DAE1D8-ON8025753E.0037EC86-8025753E.00380622@smsc.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:11:02 +0000
From: Steve.Glendinning@...c.com
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
"Stanley.Miao" <stanley.miao@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] smsc911x: add irq_flags in smsc911x_platform_config.
Hi Russell,
> > > When calling request IRQ it is desirable to allow platforms
> > > to specific flags for the call to request_irq. Adding irq_flags
> > > to smsc911x_platform_config allows these flags to be passed.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Stanley.Miao <stanley.miao@...driver.com>
> >
> > Acked-by: Steve Glendinning <steve.glendinning@...c.com>
> >
> > Thanks Stanley.
> >
> > I have two more arm platform smsc911x conversion patches (realview and
> > pcm037) which I'll post for review shortly. Both also depend on this
> > irq_flags change, as they register their interrupts shared. David:
would
> > it make sense to put this driver patch into the arm tree?
>
> Does this really make sense? Normally, the interrupt level/edge stuff
is
> passed through the resource structure.
>
> I can't really comment because it seems that there's no way to work out
> what patch you're acking. I can't find it in the last 6 months of
email,
> and there's no attributation for your quoted reply to hint at when the
> original message was sent.
Here's the patch: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/18386/
Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists