[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090120.221504.264090722.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:15:04 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: sam@...nborg.org
Cc: jaswinderlinux@...il.com, khc@...waw.pl, jaswinder@...nel.org,
arnd@...db.de, mingo@...e.hu, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: why usr/include/linux/if_frad.h is required
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 06:33:10 +0100
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 10:20:17AM +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 6:36 AM, Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl> wrote:
> > > Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...nel.org> writes:
> > >
> > >> usr/include/linux/if_frad.h is covered with CONFIG_DLCI from many years
> > >> and no body is complaining about it so it means no body is using it.
> > >>
> > >> So should we need to drop #if / #endif pair or the whole file from
> > >> userspace.
> > >
> > > I think the file. "Empty file exported to userspace", long unused. We
> > > can also have it back there, and it being not exported is an indicator
> > > that it's not used. I guess the #ifdef __KERNEL__ can be removed, too.
> >
> > I will definately define #ifdef __KERNEL__ but I am also curious after
> > defining it there is no point of making empty
> > usr/include/linux/if_frad.h
>
> Googling a bit did not turn up _any_ non-kernel hits that has relevance.
> So based on the information given in this thread I strongly
> suggest to drop the export of this header.
Sure, but on the other hand this makes all of the userland APIs
essentially inaccessible and undefined.
I bet Sangoma's internal tools reference this stuff.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists