[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090122.145615.235726630.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:56:15 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de
Cc: 12o3l@...cali.nl, rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk, srostedt@...hat.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] am79c961a: fix spin_lock usage
From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 23:29:42 +0100
> spin_lock functions take a pointer to the lock, not the lock itself.
> This error was noticed by compiling ebsa110_defconfig for linux-rt where
> the locking functions obviously are more picky about their arguments.
>
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Russell, this fix is real. Want me to take it or will you?
BTW, I took linux-arm-kernel out of the CC because all of my postings
there bounce simply because I lack reverse DNS :-/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists