[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090122145616.132983741@theryb.frec.bull.fr>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 15:56:20 +0100
From: Benjamin Thery <benjamin.thery@...l.net>
To: Dave Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Benjamin Thery <benjamin.thery@...l.net>
Subject: [PATCH 6/9] netns: ipmr: declare mroute_do_assert and mroute_do_pim
per-namespace
Preliminary work to make IPv4 multicast routing netns-aware.
Declare IPv multicast routing variables 'mroute_do_assert' and
'mroute_do_pim' per-namespace in struct netns_ipv4.
At the moment, these variables are only referenced in init_net.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Thery <benjamin.thery@...l.net>
---
include/net/netns/ipv4.h | 2 ++
net/ipv4/ipmr.c | 24 +++++++++++-------------
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
Index: net-next-2.6/include/net/netns/ipv4.h
===================================================================
--- net-next-2.6.orig/include/net/netns/ipv4.h
+++ net-next-2.6/include/net/netns/ipv4.h
@@ -61,6 +61,8 @@ struct netns_ipv4 {
struct vif_device *vif_table;
int maxvif;
atomic_t cache_resolve_queue_len;
+ int mroute_do_assert;
+ int mroute_do_pim;
#endif
};
#endif
Index: net-next-2.6/net/ipv4/ipmr.c
===================================================================
--- net-next-2.6.orig/net/ipv4/ipmr.c
+++ net-next-2.6/net/ipv4/ipmr.c
@@ -79,9 +79,6 @@ static DEFINE_RWLOCK(mrt_lock);
#define VIF_EXISTS(_net, _idx) ((_net)->ipv4.vif_table[_idx].dev != NULL)
-static int mroute_do_assert; /* Set in PIM assert */
-static int mroute_do_pim;
-
static struct mfc_cache *mfc_unres_queue; /* Queue of unresolved entries */
/* Special spinlock for queue of unresolved entries */
@@ -1003,7 +1000,7 @@ int ip_mroute_setsockopt(struct sock *sk
int v;
if (get_user(v,(int __user *)optval))
return -EFAULT;
- mroute_do_assert=(v)?1:0;
+ init_net.ipv4.mroute_do_assert = (v) ? 1 : 0;
return 0;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_IP_PIMSM
@@ -1017,11 +1014,11 @@ int ip_mroute_setsockopt(struct sock *sk
rtnl_lock();
ret = 0;
- if (v != mroute_do_pim) {
- mroute_do_pim = v;
- mroute_do_assert = v;
+ if (v != init_net.ipv4.mroute_do_pim) {
+ init_net.ipv4.mroute_do_pim = v;
+ init_net.ipv4.mroute_do_assert = v;
#ifdef CONFIG_IP_PIMSM_V2
- if (mroute_do_pim)
+ if (init_net.ipv4.mroute_do_pim)
ret = inet_add_protocol(&pim_protocol,
IPPROTO_PIM);
else
@@ -1073,10 +1070,10 @@ int ip_mroute_getsockopt(struct sock *sk
val = 0x0305;
#ifdef CONFIG_IP_PIMSM
else if (optname == MRT_PIM)
- val = mroute_do_pim;
+ val = init_net.ipv4.mroute_do_pim;
#endif
else
- val = mroute_do_assert;
+ val = init_net.ipv4.mroute_do_assert;
if (copy_to_user(optval, &val, olr))
return -EFAULT;
return 0;
@@ -1356,13 +1353,14 @@ static int ip_mr_forward(struct sk_buff
cache->mfc_un.res.wrong_if++;
true_vifi = ipmr_find_vif(skb->dev);
- if (true_vifi >= 0 && mroute_do_assert &&
+ if (true_vifi >= 0 && init_net.ipv4.mroute_do_assert &&
/* pimsm uses asserts, when switching from RPT to SPT,
so that we cannot check that packet arrived on an oif.
It is bad, but otherwise we would need to move pretty
large chunk of pimd to kernel. Ough... --ANK
*/
- (mroute_do_pim || cache->mfc_un.res.ttls[true_vifi] < 255) &&
+ (init_net.ipv4.mroute_do_pim ||
+ cache->mfc_un.res.ttls[true_vifi] < 255) &&
time_after(jiffies,
cache->mfc_un.res.last_assert + MFC_ASSERT_THRESH)) {
cache->mfc_un.res.last_assert = jiffies;
@@ -1550,7 +1548,7 @@ int pim_rcv_v1(struct sk_buff * skb)
pim = igmp_hdr(skb);
- if (!mroute_do_pim ||
+ if (!init_net.ipv4.mroute_do_pim ||
pim->group != PIM_V1_VERSION || pim->code != PIM_V1_REGISTER)
goto drop;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists