netdev - Re: RFC: Mandatory Access Control for sockets aka "personal firewalls"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4977C4E9.1090303@schaufler-ca.com>
Date:	Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:59:21 -0800
From:	Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
To:	imipak@...oo.com
CC:	rmeijer@...all.nl, Samir Bellabes <sam@...ack.fr>,
	linux-security-module <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
	Stephan Peijnik <stephan@...jnik.at>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFC: Mandatory Access Control for sockets aka "personal  firewalls"

Jonathan Day wrote:
> p.s. Which poster is going to be evil and start calling this Project MAC first?
>   
Careful, it can get much worse. What about mandatory access controls
based on the NIC address, not the IP address? That would be MAC based
MAC. Ack.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html