netdev - [PATCH] am79c961a: fix spin

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1232663382-10503-1-git-send-email-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Date:	Thu, 22 Jan 2009 23:29:42 +0100
From:	Uwe Kleine-König 
	<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk
Cc:	Roel Kluin <12o3l@...cali.nl>,
	Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>,
	Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] am79c961a: fix spin_lock usage

spin_lock functions take a pointer to the lock, not the lock itself.
This error was noticed by compiling ebsa110_defconfig for linux-rt where
the locking functions obviously are more picky about their arguments.

Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Roel Kluin <12o3l@...cali.nl>
Cc: Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
---
Hello,

unrelated to that, with arm-linux-gnu-gcc 4.3.2 I get some warnings when
compiling am79c961a.c:

/tmp/ccAfRLG9.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/ccAfRLG9.s:77: Warning: register range not in ascending order
/tmp/ccAfRLG9.s:615: Warning: register range not in ascending order
/tmp/ccAfRLG9.s:1242: Warning: register range not in ascending order

These correspond to lines 107[1] and 144 in am79c961a.c where inline
assembly is used.  E.g

	stm%?ia        %1!, {%2, %3}

so the order depends on the compilers choice for %2 and %3.

Best regards
Uwe

[1] 77 and 615 in the .s file both correspond to 107 in am79c961a.c.

 drivers/net/arm/am79c961a.c |   20 ++++++++++----------
 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/arm/am79c961a.c b/drivers/net/arm/am79c961a.c
index 0c628a9..c2d012f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/arm/am79c961a.c
+++ b/drivers/net/arm/am79c961a.c
@@ -208,9 +208,9 @@ am79c961_init_for_open(struct net_device *dev)
 	/*
 	 * Stop the chip.
 	 */
-	spin_lock_irqsave(priv->chip_lock, flags);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->chip_lock, flags);
 	write_rreg (dev->base_addr, CSR0, CSR0_BABL|CSR0_CERR|CSR0_MISS|CSR0_MERR|CSR0_TINT|CSR0_RINT|CSR0_STOP);
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(priv->chip_lock, flags);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->chip_lock, flags);
 
 	write_ireg (dev->base_addr, 5, 0x00a0); /* Receive address LED */
 	write_ireg (dev->base_addr, 6, 0x0081); /* Collision LED */
@@ -332,10 +332,10 @@ am79c961_close(struct net_device *dev)
 	netif_stop_queue(dev);
 	netif_carrier_off(dev);
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(priv->chip_lock, flags);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->chip_lock, flags);
 	write_rreg (dev->base_addr, CSR0, CSR0_STOP);
 	write_rreg (dev->base_addr, CSR3, CSR3_MASKALL);
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(priv->chip_lock, flags);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->chip_lock, flags);
 
 	free_irq (dev->irq, dev);
 
@@ -391,7 +391,7 @@ static void am79c961_setmulticastlist (struct net_device *dev)
 			am79c961_mc_hash(dmi, multi_hash);
 	}
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(priv->chip_lock, flags);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->chip_lock, flags);
 
 	stopped = read_rreg(dev->base_addr, CSR0) & CSR0_STOP;
 
@@ -405,9 +405,9 @@ static void am79c961_setmulticastlist (struct net_device *dev)
 		 * Spin waiting for chip to report suspend mode
 		 */
 		while ((read_rreg(dev->base_addr, CTRL1) & CTRL1_SPND) == 0) {
-			spin_unlock_irqrestore(priv->chip_lock, flags);
+			spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->chip_lock, flags);
 			nop();
-			spin_lock_irqsave(priv->chip_lock, flags);
+			spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->chip_lock, flags);
 		}
 	}
 
@@ -429,7 +429,7 @@ static void am79c961_setmulticastlist (struct net_device *dev)
 		write_rreg(dev->base_addr, CTRL1, 0);
 	}
 
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(priv->chip_lock, flags);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->chip_lock, flags);
 }
 
 static void am79c961_timeout(struct net_device *dev)
@@ -467,10 +467,10 @@ am79c961_sendpacket(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
 	am_writeword (dev, hdraddr + 2, TMD_OWN|TMD_STP|TMD_ENP);
 	priv->txhead = head;
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(priv->chip_lock, flags);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->chip_lock, flags);
 	write_rreg (dev->base_addr, CSR0, CSR0_TDMD|CSR0_IENA);
 	dev->trans_start = jiffies;
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(priv->chip_lock, flags);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->chip_lock, flags);
 
 	/*
 	 * If the next packet is owned by the ethernet device,
-- 
tg: (cdba4b7..) t/armmisc/spinlock-am79c961a (depends on: rmk/master)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html