netdev - Re: [PATCH] am79c961a: fix spin

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20090122.161659.261404462.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:16:59 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	rmk@....linux.org.uk
Cc:	u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de, srostedt@...hat.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] am79c961a: fix spin_lock usage

From: Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 23:40:36 +0000

> On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 02:56:15PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> > From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
> > Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 23:29:42 +0100
> > 
> > > spin_lock functions take a pointer to the lock, not the lock itself.
> > > This error was noticed by compiling ebsa110_defconfig for linux-rt where
> > > the locking functions obviously are more picky about their arguments.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
> > 
> > Russell, this fix is real.  Want me to take it or will you?
> 
> I'll take it.

Great.

> > BTW, I took linux-arm-kernel out of the CC because all of my postings
> > there bounce simply because I lack reverse DNS :-/
> 
> No need; in theory I've whitelisted your IP.  However, I've dropped
> 12o3l@...cali.nl from the CC because that address bounces.

Thanks, I noticed him bounce too.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html