[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090126082036.GB4183@ff.dom.local>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 08:20:36 +0000
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
To: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
w@....eu, dada1@...mosbay.com, ben@...s.com, mingo@...e.hu,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
jens.axboe@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tcp: splice as many packets as possible at once
On 20-01-2009 11:31, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
...
> I believe approach to meet all our goals is to have own network memory
> allocator, so that each skb could have its payload in the fragments, we
> would not suffer from the heavy fragmentation and power-of-two overhead
> for the larger MTUs, have a reserve for the OOM condition and generally
> do not depend on the main system behaviour.
>
> I will resurrect to some point my network allocator to check how things
> go in the modern environment, if no one will beat this idea first :)
>
> 1. Network (tree) allocator
> http://www.ioremap.net/projects/nta
I looked at this a bit, but alas I didn't find much for this Herbert's
idea of payload in fragments/pages. Maybe some kind of API RFC is
needed before this resurrection?
Jarek P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists