lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 08:20:36 +0000 From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com> To: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net> Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, w@....eu, dada1@...mosbay.com, ben@...s.com, mingo@...e.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, jens.axboe@...cle.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tcp: splice as many packets as possible at once On 20-01-2009 11:31, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: ... > I believe approach to meet all our goals is to have own network memory > allocator, so that each skb could have its payload in the fragments, we > would not suffer from the heavy fragmentation and power-of-two overhead > for the larger MTUs, have a reserve for the OOM condition and generally > do not depend on the main system behaviour. > > I will resurrect to some point my network allocator to check how things > go in the modern environment, if no one will beat this idea first :) > > 1. Network (tree) allocator > http://www.ioremap.net/projects/nta I looked at this a bit, but alas I didn't find much for this Herbert's idea of payload in fragments/pages. Maybe some kind of API RFC is needed before this resurrection? Jarek P. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists