[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <497F1980.1070008@itcare.pl>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 15:26:08 +0100
From: Paweł Staszewski <pstaszewski@...are.pl>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
CC: Linux Network Development list <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Netfilter Development Mailinglist
<netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ SPAM ] Re: Is this normal?
Patrick McHardy pisze:
> Paweł Staszewski wrote:
>> I have Linux that works as Router + traffic management with
>> connection tracking enabled but without making NAT
>>
>> About 600Mbit/s TX and 600Mbit/s RX forwarded traffic
>>
>> iptables -L -n -v -t raw
>> Chain PREROUTING (policy ACCEPT 3340M packets, 2623G bytes)
>> pkts bytes target prot opt in out source
>> destination
>> 3339M 2621G NOTRACK all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0
>> 0.0.0.0/0
>>
>>
>> kernel 2.6.28.2
>> CPU: Core 2, speed 2999.98 MHz (estimated)
>> Counted CPU_CLK_UNHALTED events (Clock cycles when not halted) with a
>> unit mask of 0x00 (Unhalted core cycles) count 100000
>> samples % image name app name
>> symbol name
>> 14544205 15.8604 vmlinux vmlinux
>> ctnetlink_del_expect
>
> This doesn't seem to be accurate, I'm guessing its really
> ctnetlink_conntrack_event().
>
> Does this patch make any difference?
I will check this patch today at night.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists