netdev - Re: port bound SAs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <497F4071.2040302@trash.net>
Date:	Tue, 27 Jan 2009 18:12:17 +0100
From:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To:	Paul Moore <paul.moore@...trify.com>
CC:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: port bound SAs

Paul Moore wrote:
> i did exactly that (in the original message) and it makes this test case
> work but as I point out
> 
> a) it should not be necessary 
> b) i get more SAs than I need
> c) i can no longer say that a SA is optional (this is an error in the
> pfkey/xfrm/racoon interface to combine two orthogonal concepts)
> d) I am not convinced that I have resolved all cases. Needs more testing

IIRC I tested port selectors in SA a few years ago using "ip xfrm"
and they worked fine. The xfrm interface doesn't ignore them 
(copy_from_user_state()), I think the pfkey interface also doesn't.

Please try configuring them manually using "ip xfrm state",
I'm pretty sure the bug is actually in racoon.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html