netdev - RE: port bound SAs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <BB7E16A14DE689469A181EC770AFBF4D02A77525@exch-one.centrify.com>
Date:	Tue, 27 Jan 2009 09:21:56 -0800
From:	"Paul Moore" <paul.moore@...trify.com>
To:	"David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	<kaber@...sh.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: port bound SAs

I dont know what ip xfrm means - excuse my ignorance please
I will try it 

-----Original Message-----
From: David Miller [mailto:davem@...emloft.net] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 9:21 AM
To: Paul Moore
Cc: kaber@...sh.net; netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: port bound SAs

From: "Paul Moore" <paul.moore@...trify.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 09:13:46 -0800

> the pfkey / xfrm interface throws them away
> 
> i fixed racoon to send the port numbers and they were ignored

Did you actually try "ip xfrm" as Patrick suggested?

Where exactly are the ports "thrown away" for both pfkey and xfrm
cases?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html