netdev - RE: port bound SAs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <BB7E16A14DE689469A181EC770AFBF4D02A77722@exch-one.centrify.com>
Date:	Wed, 28 Jan 2009 09:17:25 -0800
From:	"Paul Moore" <paul.moore@...trify.com>
To:	"Patrick McHardy" <kaber@...sh.net>,
	"David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: port bound SAs

So where did we get to on this?

My main question is - do you agree this is incorrect behavior of the
overall system (racoon, pfkey, xfrm, ip) without trying to say which bit
is to blame?

I have done more investigation of code and looked at what other
platforms do but that is redundant unless there is agreement that there
is a problem

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html