netdev - Re: [PATCH 01/21] RDS: Socket interface

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c0a09e5c0901281917j4e37dbc7q28fee92d872e75fe@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:17:05 -0800
From:	Andrew Grover <andy.grover@...il.com>
To:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
Cc:	Andy Grover <andy.grover@...cle.com>, rdreier@...co.com,
	rds-devel@....oracle.com, general@...ts.openfabrics.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/21] RDS: Socket interface

On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 7:46 PM, Stephen Hemminger
<shemminger@...tta.com> wrote:
>> +/* this is just used for stats gathering :/ */
>
> Then I would think a high speed protocol would use per-cpu
> and/or rcu.

For a spinlock guarding a socket list? I wouldn't think it would be
worth the complexity.

[other comments snipped, will fix per your advice, thanks!]

Regards -- Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html