[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090129044148.GA25131@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 15:41:48 +1100
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4]: net: Allow RX queue selection to seed TX queue
hashing.
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 05:45:22PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
>
> This is already proven to be false :-)
>
> Having more TX queues helps a lot. Robert's testing confirms
> this even when the number of TX queues exceeds the number of
> cores.
>
> When Robert directly maps RX queues to a single TX queue on NIU, we
> get drops at the qdisc level during his routing tests. With the TX
> queue iterator which causes all of the TX queues to be utilizied there
> are no drops.
This could just mean that the hardware has underprovisioned each
individual TX queue. Or is there some fundamental efficiency of
using multiple queues that I have missed?
But yeah if a single TX queue isn't big enough to take care of
the output from a single core then you will need multiple TX
queues. Although from an system-wide point of view it would
seem to be more optimal to make that TX queue bigger rather than
forcing the software to use multiple queues (which may come with
a bigger overhead) to make up for it.
Of course for us software developers we don't really have a choice :)
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists