netdev - Re: [PATCH] netfilter: unfold two critical loops in ip_packet

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <498330B2.4060004@cosmosbay.com>
Date:	Fri, 30 Jan 2009 17:54:10 +0100
From:	Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
To:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
CC:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Netfilter Developers <netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Network Development list <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: unfold two critical loops in ip_packet_match()

Andi Kleen a écrit :
> Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com> writes:
> 
>> While doing oprofile tests I noticed two loops are not properly unrolled by gcc
> 
> That's because nobody passed -funroll-loops. Did you try that for
> that file? Likely will need -O2 too

I dont want to unroll all loops, only those two :)
I wish gcc (4.3.2 here) was litle bit smarter :(

Without using -funroll-loops

size ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.o
   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
   6424     368      16    6808    1a98 net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.o

With -funroll-loops :

size ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.o
   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
   7144     368      16    7528    1d68 net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.o

With my patch and no -funroll-loops
   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
   6488     368      16    6872    1ad8 net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.o


> 
>> +static unsigned long ifname_compare(const void *_a, const void *_b, const void *_mask)
>> +{
>> +	const unsigned long *a = (const unsigned long *)_a;
>> +	const unsigned long *b = (const unsigned long *)_b;
>> +	const unsigned long *mask = (const unsigned long *)_mask;
>> +	unsigned long ret;
>> +
>> +	ret = (a[0] ^ b[0]) & mask[0];
>> +	ret |= (a[1] ^ b[1]) & mask[1];
>> +	if (IFNAMSIZ > 2 * sizeof(unsigned long))
>> +		ret |= (a[2] ^ b[2]) & mask[2];
>> +	if (IFNAMSIZ > 3 * sizeof(unsigned long))
>> +		ret |= (a[3] ^ b[3]) & mask[3];
> 
> That will silently break for IFNAMSIZ >= 4*sizeof(unsigned long)
> You should add a dummy loop for that or at least a BUILD_BUG_ON

It will also break the day we port linux to a 128 bits machine :)

Thanks Andi

(By the way, I still use the patch on arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_ppro.c
to have a working oprofile on my dev machine...)


[PATCH] netfilter: unfold two critical loops in ip_packet_match()

While doing oprofile tests I noticed two loops are not properly unrolled by gcc

Using hand coded unrolled loop provides nice speedup : ipt_do_table
credited of 2.52 % of cpu instead of 3.29 % in tbench, for a small
text size increase (62 bytes for both loops)


Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
---
 net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c |   34 ++++++++++++++++++-------------
 1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)


diff --git a/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c b/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c
index ef8b6ca..9298d0a 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c
@@ -65,6 +65,24 @@ do {								\
 #define inline
 #endif
 
+static unsigned long ifname_compare(const void *_a, const void *_b, const void *_mask)
+{
+	const unsigned long *a = (const unsigned long *)_a;
+	const unsigned long *b = (const unsigned long *)_b;
+	const unsigned long *mask = (const unsigned long *)_mask;
+	unsigned long ret;
+
+	ret = (a[0] ^ b[0]) & mask[0];
+	if (IFNAMSIZ > sizeof(unsigned long))
+		ret |= (a[1] ^ b[1]) & mask[1];
+	if (IFNAMSIZ > 2 * sizeof(unsigned long))
+		ret |= (a[2] ^ b[2]) & mask[2];
+	if (IFNAMSIZ > 3 * sizeof(unsigned long))
+		ret |= (a[3] ^ b[3]) & mask[3];
+	BUILD_BUG_ON(IFNAMSIZ > 4 * sizeof(unsigned long));
+	return ret;
+}
+
 /*
    We keep a set of rules for each CPU, so we can avoid write-locking
    them in the softirq when updating the counters and therefore
@@ -83,7 +101,6 @@ ip_packet_match(const struct iphdr *ip,
 		const struct ipt_ip *ipinfo,
 		int isfrag)
 {
-	size_t i;
 	unsigned long ret;
 
 #define FWINV(bool, invflg) ((bool) ^ !!(ipinfo->invflags & (invflg)))
@@ -103,13 +120,7 @@ ip_packet_match(const struct iphdr *ip,
 		return false;
 	}
 
-	/* Look for ifname matches; this should unroll nicely. */
-	for (i = 0, ret = 0; i < IFNAMSIZ/sizeof(unsigned long); i++) {
-		ret |= (((const unsigned long *)indev)[i]
-			^ ((const unsigned long *)ipinfo->iniface)[i])
-			& ((const unsigned long *)ipinfo->iniface_mask)[i];
-	}
-
+	ret = ifname_compare(indev, ipinfo->iniface, ipinfo->iniface_mask);
 	if (FWINV(ret != 0, IPT_INV_VIA_IN)) {
 		dprintf("VIA in mismatch (%s vs %s).%s\n",
 			indev, ipinfo->iniface,
@@ -117,12 +128,7 @@ ip_packet_match(const struct iphdr *ip,
 		return false;
 	}
 
-	for (i = 0, ret = 0; i < IFNAMSIZ/sizeof(unsigned long); i++) {
-		ret |= (((const unsigned long *)outdev)[i]
-			^ ((const unsigned long *)ipinfo->outiface)[i])
-			& ((const unsigned long *)ipinfo->outiface_mask)[i];
-	}
-
+	ret = ifname_compare(outdev, ipinfo->outiface, ipinfo->outiface_mask);
 	if (FWINV(ret != 0, IPT_INV_VIA_OUT)) {
 		dprintf("VIA out mismatch (%s vs %s).%s\n",
 			outdev, ipinfo->outiface,


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html