netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: add tracepoints to socket api

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20090201.020247.247498390.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Sun, 01 Feb 2009 02:02:47 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	nhorman@...driver.com
Cc:	hch@...radead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: add tracepoints to socket api

From: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 16:28:09 -0500

> Of course, these provided tracepoints don't do that, but I think it
> would be good to get the existing tracepoint set in before I go
> poking at an implementation of that, just to ensure I avoid
> duplicate work

Christoph's point is that it doesn't make any sense to merge
this stuff in without any upstream users.

The block stuff has such users, this net syscall trace stuff doesn't.

Now your "where is the packet dropped" trace thing, that would
something we could merge once that patch and a suitable tool exists.
Just like the block layer cases.

So I have to toss this patch for now, sorry.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html